All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] on-demand readahead
Date: 25 Apr 2007 16:37:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73odlc34ga.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <377506695.54393@ustc.edu.cn>

Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com> writes:

> OVERHEADS
> 
> The new code reduced the overheads of
> 
> 	- excessively calling the readahead routine on small sized reads
> 	  (the current readahead code insists on seeing all requests)
> 
> 	- doing a lot of pointless page-cache lookups for small cached files
> 	  (the current readahead only turns itself off after 256 cache hits,
> 	  unfortunately most files are < 1MB, so never see that chance)

Would it make sense to keep track in the AS if the file is completely in cache?
Then you could probably avoid a lot of these lookups for small in cache files

> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm1.orig/mm/readahead.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm1/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,11 @@ unsigned long max_sane_readahead(unsigne

Quite simple patch, why is it that much simpler than your earlier patchkits?
Or is that on top of them?

You seem to have a lot of magic numbers. They probably all need symbols and 
explanations.

Your white space also needs some work.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-25 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-25 13:11 [RFC][PATCH] on-demand readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-04-25 13:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-04-25 14:37   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-25 16:04     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-04-25 16:04       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-04-26  6:58         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-25 16:08       ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-26  1:16         ` Fengguang Wu
2007-04-26  1:16           ` Fengguang Wu
2007-05-02 10:02             ` [RFC] splice() and readahead interaction Eric Dumazet
     [not found]               ` <f6b15c890705050204l11045ba3w66c8c4ae0ac3407f@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-07 21:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 19:53                 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73odlc34ga.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.