All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP stack behaviour question
Date: 18 Sep 2006 10:29:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73slip4lyf.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <057a01c6d8ec$4d52c7b0$294b82ce@stuartm>

"Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com> writes:

> I'm having some trouble with a network application I've written. I've
> done a lot of research the last few days; man 7 ip, man 7 tcp, kernel
> 2.4.31 source code, Stevens' Illustrated TCP/IP Vol 1 & 3 (for some
> reason we don't have Vol 2), Usenet, websites. I'm hoping someone here
> can help me out, or point me in the correct direction.

Stevens is a good reference to BSD networking, but not necessarily to Linux.

> Question 1: There's the original packet, plus 7 retransmitted packets
> for a total of 8, then TCP gives up. How is 7 (or 8) derived from the
> tcp_retries[12] settings?

Documented in tcp(7)
 
> Question 1a: The time between last and second-last retransmit packets
> is only about 27 seconds. I've read there's a maximum time, but also
> that it's usually 100 or 120 seconds. Where can I find that setting in
> /proc?

It's fixed by the TCP specification.

> Question 2: After the retransmit has given up, the app is still
> making an occasional write(), which succeeds! However, tearing down
> and attemting a new connection results in an immediate EHOSTUNREACH
> error. Why is the write() succeeding?

It goes all in the local buffer, until it starts blocking (or EAGAIN
for non blocking sockets)

> 
> Question 2a: How can my app find out the EHOSTUNREACH error
> immediately? IP_RECVERR is not implemented on TCP, and SO_ERROR always
> reports no error (0).

Did you really read the manpages?  It is implemented and it's documented.

-Andi (your new temporary manpage proxy)  

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-18  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-15 17:28 TCP stack behaviour question Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-18  8:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-09-18 13:20   ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-18 13:54     ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 14:19       ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-18 14:31         ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:38           ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-18 17:01             ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-19  6:13               ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-19  6:47                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 14:50               ` Michael Kerrisk
2006-09-20  9:55                 ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-18 18:29 Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-19 12:03 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-09-19 14:00   ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-20  9:54     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73slip4lyf.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stuartm@connecttech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.