From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crazy idea of cleanup the inode_record btrfsck things with SQL?
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 05:47:18 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$6be5e$a00482b7$895022c1$577dcbfa@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 547BDF82.3030305@cn.fujitsu.com
Qu Wenruo posted on Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:24:50 +0800 as excerpted:
> The db file is mostly used in memory, only when the metadata is really
> really big, maybe when the fs tree's level is 7 or 8 we may need to use
> db file.
So fscking the database in ordered to fsck the database isn't an issue.
One objection down! =:^)
But seriously, the politics of the idea remains its biggest nemesis in my
opinion. And in systemd we've unfortunately a live demonstration of just
how big a nemesis that can be. =:^( If the technical reasoning for it
is sound and the benefit high enough, great, but IMO the benefit will
need to be pretty high to justify the risk of political fallout, and I
doubt it's anything close to that high. But it's not my call, so we'll
see. Thinks could certainly get interesting if it's judged to be worth
it. < Checking popcorn stash >
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 1:58 Crazy idea of cleanup the inode_record btrfsck things with SQL? Qu Wenruo
2014-12-01 3:08 ` Duncan
2014-12-01 3:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-01 5:47 ` Duncan [this message]
2014-12-01 6:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-01 4:03 ` Robert White
2014-12-01 6:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-01 18:10 ` Robert White
2014-12-02 1:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-03 19:18 ` Robert White
2014-12-04 6:56 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-10 21:57 ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-12-11 2:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-11 2:27 ` Zygo Blaxell
2014-12-01 12:53 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-12-02 0:37 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-12-11 19:00 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-12-11 19:38 ` Roger Binns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$6be5e$a00482b7$895022c1$577dcbfa@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.