From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39289 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbaBXGck (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:32:40 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHp5i-000486-Ex for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:32:38 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:32:38 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:32:38 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: btrfs userland interface isn't 32/64bit clean (breaks lsattr and btrfs send) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 06:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140224055103.GA15937@merlins.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marc MERLIN posted on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:51:03 -0800 as excerpted: > In the end I pinned it down to this: > 3.13.5's kernel/userland interface fails if my kernel is 64bit and my > userland 32bit. This is a known issue. There's patches in the pipeline for 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel, already. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman