From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1, SSD+non-SSD
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 03:31:22 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$9d070$ec02cf80$defe792b$ff8d4b74@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mp0iqb-1f5.ln1@hurikhan77.spdns.de
Kai Krakow posted on Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:06:14 +0100 as excerpted:
> BTW: Is there work in progress to let btrfs choose which device to read
> from or write to other than using round-robin or pid mapping? Maybe it
> would be interesting to watch the current read and write latencies of
> all drives and choose the one with the lowest latency. Tho, I think it
> won't make much sense when passing accesses through btrfs.
There's several projects in that general area suggested on the wiki.
You'd need to look there for status (unclaimed, claimed, in progress,
etc) and to see if any of them match well enough to what you had in mind
or if you might wish to add another.
There's definitely optimization planned, with the project ideas mentioned
above going beyond that. However, I'm not sure of the status of the
actually planned optimization either. There's certainly the standard
premature optimization thing to worry about, but arguably, we're past the
point at which it'd be premature now, and actually need it, if for no
other reason, because making a case for true btrfs stability is rather
difficult if such optimization is still being held off as premature, or
isn't being held off any longer, but that state is so new the
optimization simply hasn't been done yet.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-08 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 20:01 RAID1, SSD+non-SSD Brian B
2015-02-07 0:23 ` Chris Murphy
2015-02-07 18:06 ` Kai Krakow
2015-02-08 3:31 ` Duncan [this message]
2015-02-07 6:39 ` Duncan
2015-02-07 12:42 ` RAID1, SSD+non-SSD (RAID 5/6 question) Ed Tomlinson
2015-02-08 3:18 ` Duncan
2015-02-08 2:41 ` RAID1, SSD+non-SSD Brian B
2015-02-08 3:51 ` Duncan
2015-02-07 17:28 ` Kyle Manna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$9d070$ec02cf80$defe792b$ff8d4b74@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.