All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs space used issue
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:54:10 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2892a866-fdc3-b337-4cd4-2cd4a18b9f21@gmail.com

Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:24:40 -0500 as
excerpted:

>> I believe this effect is what Austin was referencing when he suggested
>> the defrag, tho defrag won't necessarily /entirely/ clear it up.  One
>> way to be /sure/ it's cleared up would be to rewrite the entire file,
>> deleting the original, either by copying it to a different filesystem
>> and back (with the off-filesystem copy guaranteeing that it can't use
>> reflinks to the existing extents), or by using cp's --reflink=never
>> option.
>> (FWIW, I prefer the former, just to be sure, using temporary copies to
>> a suitably sized tmpfs for speed where possible, tho obviously if the
>> file is larger than your memory size that's not possible.)

> Correct, this is why I recommended trying a defrag.  I've actually never
> seen things so bad that a simple defrag didn't fix them however (though
> I have seen a few cases where the target extent size had to be set
> higher than the default of 20MB).

Good to know.  I knew larger target extent sizes could help, but between 
not being sure they'd entirely fix it and not wanting to get too far down 
into the detail when the copy-off-the-filesystem-and-back option is 
/sure/ to fix the problem, I decided to handwave that part of it. =:^)

> Also, as counter-intuitive as it
> might sound, autodefrag really doesn't help much with this, and can
> actually make things worse.

I hadn't actually seen that here, but suspect I might, now, as previous 
autodefrag behavior on my system tended to rewrite the entire file[1], 
thereby effectively giving me the benefit of the copy-away-and-back 
technique without actually bothering, while that "bug" has now been fixed.

I sort of wish the old behavior remained an option, maybe 
radicalautodefrag or something, and must confess to being a bit concerned 
over the eventual impact here now that autodefrag does /not/ rewrite the 
entire file any more, but oh, well...  Chances are it's not going to be 
/that/ big a deal since I /am/ on fast ssd, and if it becomes one, I 
guess I can just setup say firefox-profile-defrag.timer jobs or whatever, 
as necessary.

---
[1] I forgot whether it was ssd behavior, or compression, or what, but 
something I'm using here apparently forced autodefrag to rewrite the 
entire file, and a recent "bugfix" changed that so it's more in line with 
the normal autodefrag behavior.  I rather preferred the old behavior, 
especially since I'm on fast ssd and all my large files tend to be write-
once no-rewrite anyway, but I understand the performance implications on 
large active-rewrite files such as gig-plus database and VM-image files, 
so...

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27 13:09 btrfs space used issue vinayak hegde
2018-02-27 13:54 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28  6:01   ` vinayak hegde
2018-02-28 15:22     ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01  9:26       ` vinayak hegde
2018-03-01 10:18         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-03-01 12:25           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-03-03  6:59         ` Duncan
2018-03-05 15:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-05 16:17             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:09 ` Duncan
2018-02-28 19:24   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-02-28 19:54     ` Duncan [this message]
2018-02-28 20:15       ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='pan$dd7e7$8a56ef21$d7fa0ab5$d833c283@cox.net' \
    --to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.