From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C256DD767FB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA680592; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_tIW9caknk2; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7ADF1805A5 Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF1805A5; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0335E50 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C94640126 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id ettx8CKRlfPB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=116.202.254.214; helo=ciao.gmane.io; envelope-from=gclub-buildroot@m.gmane-mx.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp2.osuosl.org 3E414400D7 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3E414400D7 Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E414400D7 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t6bk9-0004pq-OM for buildroot@uclibc.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:26:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: buildroot@uclibc.org From: Bernd Kuhls Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20241031193809.711402-1-bernd@kuhls.net> <20241031205835.13b00d20__29671.8216895655$1730404740$gmane$org@windsurf> Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4) X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kuhls.net Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/netstat-nat: bump version to 2a X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Am Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:58:35 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot: >> +NETSTAT_NAT_SOURCE = $(NETSTAT_NAT_VERSION).tar.gz >> +NETSTAT_NAT_SITE = https://git.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/netstat-nat-ng/ archive > > Could you switch to Git download instead? Indeed we're not sure those > tarballs are stable, and a tarball named 2a.tar.gz isn't exactly nice. Hi Thomas, quoting the project homepage https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/netstat-nat-ng/ "Release tarballs [...] are thus available on the refs listing/tag page" >From that refs page https://git.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/netstat-nat-ng/refs, which looks to me as providing release versions, I took the tarball which has this, indeed, weird filename. Clicking the link in Firefox provides "netstat-nat-ng-2a.tar.gz" however and with wget you would need "--content-disposition" to receive the full filename. Having the option to download an upstream-provided tarball I would like to stick to it. Would it be possible, even optionally, to add "--content- disposition" when wget is used for downlaods? Regards, Bernd _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot