From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbqZE-0004CS-9I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 23:01:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbqZB-0004CG-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 23:01:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbqZB-0004CD-PC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 23:01:17 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FbqZF-0000LK-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 23:01:21 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FbqZ7-0004NZ-Rj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 05:01:13 +0200 Received: from cpe-70-116-9-243.austin.res.rr.com ([70.116.9.243]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 05:01:13 +0200 Received: from anthony by cpe-70-116-9-243.austin.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 05:01:13 +0200 From: Anthony Liguori Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 22:01:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <445A0480.7010001@cnpbagwell.com> <445A4520.9040300@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unknown PCI Bridge Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 04 May 2006 20:17:04 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Chris Bagwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I upgraded to current CVS (0.8.1 plus a couple of patches like acpi). >> Last time I upgraded was about 1 week ago. >> >> When I ran this version with a win98 guest, windows detected a new >> device called "PCI Bridge". It was unable to find a driver for this on >> the win98 CD and placed it as not working in the "other devices" section >> of device manager. >> >> Doesn't seem to harm anything. I was guessing it had something to do >> with the acpi patches but haven't verified. Any ideas? > > Yes, ACPI adds a new PCI device so it is normal. I am interested by any > regression found using the current CVS with ACPI... Win2k and Linux 2.6 (w/o kqemu) seem to work fine. with -kernel-kqemu and 2.6.15, I get: Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel. BIOS bug, local APIC #0 not detected! IOAPIC[0]: Invalid reference to IRQ 0 IOAPIC[0]: Invalid reference to IRQ 0 PCI PIIX3: Enabling Passive Release on 0000:00:01.0 ALERT! /dev/hda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell! Regards, Anthony Liguori > Fabrice.