From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: New: seeing 100% CPU / unkillable tasks
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:58:04 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2015.02.22.17.58.04@googlemail.com> (raw)
kernel: 3.18.7 + all patches since 3.19 + the daily Filipe ;)
For the last few days I've been getting an awful lot of stuck tasks
after mundane operations like simple rsync'ing, an fallocate or just
doign a manual "sync".
Symptom is always 100% CPU use and the task (user-space fallocate, sync
or the [btrfs-transaction] kthread on eventual tx commit) hanging.
This happens even without stress (idle single-disk fs/system, no mem pressure)
and very irregularly. Today I got particularly unlucky and could trigger it
repeatedly, simply by doing a bunch of small fallocates on a fresh subvolume:
the first few would work and then - boom.
A full collection of several SysRq traces is at:
https://gist.github.com/hhoffstaette/c54ca2813cd47439c4c1
I've inserted spaces between different runs and SysRq segments to make
it a bit easier to read.
Common theme is almost always:
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff812baa36>] ? __percpu_counter_add+0x56/0x80
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa07b566c>] ? find_first_extent_bit_state+0x2c/0x80 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff8108bb1b>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.36+0x2b/0x50
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff81075023>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0x83/0x100
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa07980ff>] wait_current_trans.isra.17+0x9f/0x100 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff81075130>] ? __wake_up_sync+0x20/0x20
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa0799ad8>] start_transaction+0x318/0x5a0 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa0799e17>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa079486b>] transaction_kthread+0x8b/0x260 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa07947e0>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x520/0x520 [btrfs]
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff810685eb>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff81068510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff8153f1ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
Feb 22 12:44:03 tux kernel: [<ffffffff81068510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
or this:
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa056a809>] btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x49/0x90 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa056a8a5>] btrfs_clear_path_blocking+0x55/0xe0 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa056f657>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1f7/0xa60 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa0585955>] btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x270 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa060b4fd>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x1e5/0x285 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa0594135>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x525/0xbb0 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa05d671d>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffffa05a9f5c>] btrfs_sync_file+0x1fc/0x330 [btrfs]
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffff81191531>] do_fsync+0x51/0x80
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffff811602e7>] ? SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x80
Feb 22 14:08:45 tux kernel: [<ffffffff811917d0>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
Clearly something is going into endless active loops and not terminating as it
should.
I realize this is vague but wanted to check if
- anyone is seeing this/something similar recently
- might have a suspect?
I've already backtracked a bit and can rule out Filipe's recent inode handling/fsync
stuff. The problem must have snuck in recently (last 2-3 weeks).
Grateful for any suggestions!
-h
reply other threads:[~2015-02-22 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2015.02.22.17.58.04@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.