From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 4] libxl: use libxl__ namespace for hidden
	functions
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:07:52 +0100
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1283854072@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

As described in libxl.h header internal functions should use the
libxl__ namespace.

I'm not sure this churn is worth it but we are starting to see patches
adding internal functions which do not follow the convention and it is
hard to ask for a respin with a straight face when there is so much
existing dirty laundry so we should either obey the documented
convention or ditch it.

I didn't touch flexarrays or xs_writev which is something of a special
case for use in dm_xenstore_record_pid (libxl__xs_writev already
exists but isn't immediately suitable for use).