From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 4] libxl: Add enumeration type to IDL
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:09:12 +0000
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1300975752@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


As part of this I namespace some enum values, firstly within the
LIBXL_ namespace (which is clearly a good idea) but secondly to
namespace the values to within their respective typename, which is
less clearly of benefit. It makes the IDL for enumerations somewhat
cleaner but I'm not totally wedded to it -- opinions welcome.