From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: dario.faggioli@citrix.com, keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 2] x86/numa logical fixes
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:49:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1342010994@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
These patches attempt to correct some of the Xen NUMA logic with respect to NUMA
nodes without attached memory. They are a followup to my earlier RFC patche on
27/06/2012
Given the nature of the issue, I would recomend that they be considered for 4.2
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-11 12:49 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-07-11 12:49 ` [PATCH 1 of 2] x86/numa: Correct assumption that each NUMA node has memory Andrew Cooper
2012-07-11 12:49 ` [PATCH 2 of 2] x86/numa: Remove warning about small NUMA nodes Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1342010994@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.