From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Xen-Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00 of 11 v4] NUMA aware credit scheduling
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:30:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <patchbomb.1363314642@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> (raw)
Hello,
Round 4 of the NUMA aware scheduling series. Very few going on, actually, as
the comments to v3 where not a big deal... Nevertheless, I, as usual, really
appreciated them a lot, and I think I've addressed them all. The only notable
change is on patch 05/11, where I discovered a small but nasty bug (see the
specific changelog).
I couldn't rerun the full set of my usual benchmarks, but I really don't think
that to be necessary, as practically no functional change is being introduced,
wrt to v3. However, I did run a couple of them, randomly, just to be sure,
and the numbers actually do look almost identical to these ones:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-02/msg00009.html
What I'm now missing is a couple of Ack-s from the relevant people. In fact,
almost all the patches carry more than one Ack, but there are a few of them
which are missing Ack-s from the actual maintainers of the code they touch.
In some more details, and with
'*'='properly Ack-ed',
'+'= 'Ack-ed but _not_ by the maintainer',
here it comes the series:
* 01/11 xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap
* 02/11 xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t
* 03/11 xen: sched_credit: when picking, make sure we get an idle one, if any
+ 04/11 xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity
* 05/11 xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
* 06/11 libxc: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
+ 07/11 libxl: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity
+ 08/11 libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate
+ 09/11 libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity
+ 10/11 xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list
* 11/11 docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation
So, George, if, as you said, you're fine with it, could you explicitly
ack 04/11 ?
Also, IanC and IanJ, could you have a look and ack (if you feel like
so, of course) 07/11, 08/11, 09/11 and 10/11 ?
Thanks a lot and Regads,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 2:30 Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 01 of 11 v4] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 02 of 11 v4] xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 03 of 11 v4] xen: sched_credit: when picking, make sure we get an idle one, if any Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-15 10:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 10:55 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-18 14:02 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-18 14:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 04 of 11 v4] xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 13:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 05 of 11 v4] xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 8:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-15 14:20 ` Daniel De Graaf
2013-03-16 7:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 06 of 11 v4] libxc: " Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 07 of 11 v4] libxl: " Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:33 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-18 14:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 08 of 11 v4] libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:34 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 09 of 11 v4] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:36 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 10 of 11 v4] xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 3:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-03-18 14:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-18 14:13 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-18 14:22 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 11 of 11 v4] docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=patchbomb.1363314642@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=anil@recoil.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.