From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jari Aalto Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rebase.sh: Change .dotest directory to .git-dotest Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:25:42 +0200 Organization: Private Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 05 22:27:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMVJw-00056O-4S for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:27:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758866AbYBEV0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:26:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758806AbYBEV0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:26:39 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60723 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758088AbYBEV0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:26:38 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JMVJF-00057F-Az for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:26:29 +0000 Received: from a91-155-178-181.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.155.178.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:26:29 +0000 Received: from jari.aalto by a91-155-178-181.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:26:29 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-155-178-181.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JXjB7DHXFOANwCev6XdOlBDTCN4= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Tue 2008-02-05 Johannes Schindelin > > If at all, it should be in .git/rebase/ Much better. > we have a different directory already for interactive rebase and rebase > -m, .git/.dotest-merge/ (which could have been a better name, too). Yes, that should go to .git too. > But the consensus was that there might be scripts relying on the name of > the directory Who would use or rely on the internal workings of git-rebase? The will not be any considerable amount of those. I'm confident that those people have enough expertise to change their scripts. The current situation is plain ugly and git shouldn't stomp on any other dir than .git Jari -- Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines