From: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jnareb@gmail.com, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] v2.19.0-rc1 Performance Regression in 'git merge-base'
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:58:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.28.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
As I was testing the release candidate, I stumbled across a regression in
'git merge-base' as a result of the switch to generation numbers. The commit
message in [PATCH 1/1] describes the topology involved, but you can test it
yourself by comparing 'git merge-base v4.8 v4.9' in the Linux kernel. The
regression does not show up when running merge-base for tags at least v4.9,
which is why I didn't see it when I was testing earlier.
The solution is simple, but also will conflict with ds/reachable in next. I
can send a similar patch that applies the same diff into commit-reach.c.
With the integration of generation numbers into most commit walks coming to
a close [1], it will be time to re-investigate other options for
reachability indexes [2]. As I was digging into the issue with this
regression, I discovered a way we can modify our generation numbers and pair
them with commit dates to give us a simple-to-compute, immutable
two-dimensional reachability index that would be immune to this regression.
I will investigate that more and report back, but it is more important to
fix this regression now.
Thanks, -Stolee
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.25.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/[PATCH
0/6] Use generation numbers for --topo-order
[2] https://public-inbox.org/git/86muxcuyod.fsf@gmail.com/[RFC] Other chunks
for commit-graph, part 2 - reachability indexes
Cc: gitster@pobox.comCc: peff@peff.net
Derrick Stolee (1):
commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed
commit.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
base-commit: 2f743933341f276111103550fbf383a34dfcfd38
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tags/pr-28%2Fderrickstolee%2Fmerge-base-regression-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-28/derrickstolee/merge-base-regression-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/28
--
gitgitgadget
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 12:58 Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget [this message]
2018-08-30 12:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2018-10-06 16:54 ` Jakub Narebski
2018-08-30 15:26 ` [PATCH 0/1] v2.19.0-rc1 Performance Regression in 'git merge-base' Junio C Hamano
2018-10-06 16:09 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.28.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.