From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Kuhls Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:43:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/libva: remove optional mesa3d support References: <20190407171318.19852-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20190410191307.1681df76@windsurf.home> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Am Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:13:07 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > I understand the circular dependency issue, but what makes it reasonable > to drop mesa3d support in libva ? Until now, the choice was rather the > opposite: have mesa3d support in libva, and no libva support in mesa3d. > Is there a fundamental reason why one is more useful than the other ? Hi Thomas, first I like to mention that I do not have any AMD hardware in use with buildroot, I am just following the development of Libreelec: https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/13333 https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/2403 The motivation for the Kodi patch was: "Hardware decoding with AMD GPUs is only supported with this new method" Because I think this will improve user experience with AMD hardware I sent these patches. Regards, Bernd