From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds),
adam@yggdrasil.com (Adam J. Richter),
parsley@roanoke.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel)
Subject: Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix
Date: 08 Jan 2001 15:49:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <qwwk886t7xu.fsf@sap.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E14FdV7-0004gd-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: Alan Cox's message of "Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:42:18 +0000 (GMT)"
Hi Alan,
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> I have been thinking about this. I think we should merge the size
> limiting code with the example clean ramfs code. Having spent a
> while debugging the LFS checks and some other funnies I realised one
> problem with the ramfs in 2.4.0 as an example. It does not
> demonstrate error cases, which the new one does.
For demonstration purposes perhaps. But I do not see a lot of value of
using ramfs if shmem could do read and write.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-08 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-07 6:41 Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix Adam J. Richter
2001-01-07 13:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-07 19:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-07 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-07 21:11 ` Rik van Riel
2001-01-07 21:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-08 6:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-01-07 21:54 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-08 13:37 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-01-08 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-01-08 14:43 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-01-08 14:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-08 14:49 ` Christoph Rohland [this message]
2001-01-07 20:39 ` David L. Parsley
2001-01-08 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-08 3:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-08 13:11 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-08 12:30 ` Shane Nay
2001-01-08 14:34 ` David Woodhouse
2001-01-10 23:30 ` [PATCH] one-liner fix for bforget() honoring BH_Protected; was: " David L. Parsley
2001-01-11 4:23 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=qwwk886t7xu.fsf@sap.com \
--to=cr@sap.com \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parsley@roanoke.edu \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.