From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bg5XZ-0004oK-13 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:40:05 -0700 Received: from orange.ous.edu ([140.211.15.17]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg5XY-0007K6-OI for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:40:04 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Anthony Brock" Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems compiling 2.4 kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:40:09 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Okay, I found my problem. My problem was attempting to compile using: make ARCH=3Dum rather than: make linux ARCH=3Dum The compile is running as I type. Like an idiot, I keep forgetting to look = at my prior notes. It appears that I encountered and resolved this issue ov= er three months ago. This change resolves the symlink issue in addition to several others (I did= try manually creating the link earlier, but still had problems). Tony >>> BlaisorBlade 07/01/04 10:36AM >>> Alle 18:43, gioved=EC 1 luglio 2004, Jeff Dike ha scritto: > Anthony_Brock@ous.edu said: The problem is another: uml Makefile don't manage properly the=20 include/asm/arch symlink, and it is not created: > asm/arch/posix_types.h: No such file or directory To workaround this: cd include cd asm ln -s ../asm-i386 arch There is a lot of other people claiming similar problems. For instance,=20 somebody else complained that to build UML he must avoid doing "make mrprop= er=20 ARCH=3Dum" because some files are not recreated (with 2.4.24-3). However, Anthony, I would recommend using, for optimal stability, a 2.4.26 = vanilla kernel patched with 2.4.24-1um + the attached patch. Bye --=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -=20 digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,=20 unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel