From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750794AbWGVPWE (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:22:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750796AbWGVPWE (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:22:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]:52490 "EHLO smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbWGVPWC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:22:02 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.2 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:21:15 +0200 From: "Luuk van der Duim" To: Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian wrote: -- The Linux kernel sometimes looses developers. That seems to unavoidable, there are there are always problems like: - Some developers leave the projects if their code was rejected because it didn't match the standards and policies of the project. - Some developers leave the project if other people's code that didn't match the standards and policies of the project was accepted. -- *Cough*DonaldBecker AndreHedrick*Cough* .. Luuk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient" 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it on usenet. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message.