From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: Why do I get broken pipe on write to a pcm in statePREPARED? Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:31:28 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Tim Goetze Cc: Abramo Bagnara , Jaroslav Kysela , Anders Torger , "alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:18:29 +0200 (CEST), Tim Goetze wrote: > > >> Sincerely I think this is a stupid approach and I doubt that making it > >> conditional is a smarter idea. > > > >agreed here. > i can't say i understand precisely what you agree on here. agreed that making it conditional is not better idea. > what i see is that so far every now and then somebody writes to this > list puzzled at how poll can return immediately from polling a pcm > stream that is not running. > > if you don't think this behaviour is broken then *please* update the > documentation, and clearly state how and why the poll implementation > handles things like it does. i believe it's mis-implementation. should be fixed. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf