From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] snd-hda: fix build errors
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:48:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h4p20ccrl.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49271D1A.8040509@oracle.com>
At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:42:02 -0800,
Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:02:48 -0800,
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> First error comes from snd_hda_eld_proc_new() not being static
> >> when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. After that is fixed, the next problem is:
> >> ERROR: "snd_print_pcm_rates" [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko] undefined!
> >>
> >> so I made a static inline version of that one too, for CONFIG_PROC_FS=n.
> >> Please build/test more config variations.
> >>
> >> LD [M] sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_eld.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_hwdep.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_generic.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x1d): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_cmedia.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_atihdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_conexant.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_via.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> sound/pci/hda/patch_intelhdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new':
> >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new'
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here
> >> make[4]: *** [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o] Error 1
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> >> cc: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
> >> cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> >> ---
> >> sound/pci/hda/hda_local.h | 7 ++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Thanks, but these have been differently fixed on the latest ALSA tree.
> > snd_print_pcm_*() have to be defined no matter what CONFIG_PROC_FS is.
>
> No problem. Just for clarification, is linux-next one day behind
> your latest tree, or is linux-next using a different branch of it,
> or what?
The former, just due to the time zone :)
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 7:19 linux-next: Tree for November 21 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-21 20:02 ` [PATCH linux-next] snd-hda: fix build errors Randy Dunlap
2008-11-21 20:27 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-21 20:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-11-22 9:48 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2008-11-22 1:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-22 15:07 ` vme_scc.c breakage (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 21) Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-22 16:47 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-23 2:29 ` Michael Schmitz
2008-11-23 2:59 ` Brad Boyer
2008-11-23 4:40 ` Michael Schmitz
2008-11-23 9:22 ` Brad Boyer
2008-11-24 1:55 ` Michael Schmitz
2008-11-24 6:08 ` Brad Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h4p20ccrl.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.