From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934461AbeAJPn2 (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:43:28 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50365 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932880AbeAJPnZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:43:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Mika Westerberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Missing watchdog after ACPI watchdog creation failure In-Reply-To: <20180110152343.GO27654@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20180110152343.GO27654@lahna.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:23:43 +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:13:51PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on the recent kernels, i2c-i801 skips the creation of iTCO wdt when > > ACPI WDAT is present. It's fine when ACPI really creates the watchdog > > device. But, we've got a report showing that the watchdog is missing > > on some machines because ACPI failed to create, and yet i2c-i801 still > > skips because acpi_has_watchdog() returns true. > > > > More specifically, the machine gets an error from acpi_watchdog.c > > like: > > platform wdat_wdt: failed to claim resource 3: [io 0x040a-0x040c] > > ACPI: watchdog: Device creation failed: -16 > > > > where the region was registered by pnp, > > % cat /proc/ioports > > .... > > 0400-047f : pnp 00:01 > > > > > > One may say that BIOS sucks, but OTOH, the complete lack of watchdog > > thereafter can be seen as a regression, too. It used to work on the > > older kernel as iTCO wdt was provided by i2c-i801. > > Hmm, if the resource is already taken I wonder how iTCO can work? Are > you sure iTCO works on those systems? Yes, that's the reason we got a bug report :) 4.4 kernel worked, and 4.12 (and later) don't. On 4.4.x, % /proc/ioports 0000-0cf7 : PCI Bus 0000:00 ... 0400-047f : pnp 00:01 0400-041f : iTCO_wdt 0400-041f : iTCO_wdt 0500-0503 : ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK On 4.12.x, % /proc/ioports 0000-0cf7 : PCI Bus 0000:00 ... 0400-047f : pnp 00:01 0500-053f : pnp 00:01 > > Shouldn't acpi_has_watchdog() rather checks whether the watchdog > > device creation succeeded or not? > > Yes, or rather we should first figure out what the actual problem is ;-) > > Are you able to get acpidump from that system with full dmesg? I'll ask the reporter. thanks, Takashi