From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: TRAM on Audigy Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:40:46 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <200307071042.MAA08639@www3.pobox.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200307071042.MAA08639@www3.pobox.sk> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: p z oooo Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:42:13 +0200, p z oooo wrote: > > I know about this, but for me is simpler to add 20 DSP instruction > than change 100 lines of driver code. i think the pass-thru on audigy can be implemented more easily without using TRAM. it doesn't need any change of driver codes, but only a new DSP routing, i guess. > ALSA emu10k1 driver uses only TRAM for AC3 passthrough, other method > is not implemented. > > And I don't need (I don't have receiver) AC3 passthrough (this will > by bonus for others), what I need is working TRAM on Audigy. yeah, of course, it would be great if we support TRAM generally :) BTW, i've never heard/seen the info of TRAM on audigy, too. so, i believe there is no official information about that yet. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01