From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: why is no-one responding are you all just a bunch of &*^%&^%^& wits??? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:44:00 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <1045066617.25120.22.camel@shippin> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Paul Davis Cc: linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu, ardour-dev , alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:49:08 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > > when ardour is in a state where i believe (rightly or wrongly) that a > reasonably typical target user can sit down and just use it without > encountering bugs when recording a typical 12-32 track piece, there > will be binaries. don't forget that the binary distribution may cause different kind of problems, too. the binary might not run on different distributions, or even on a different machine with a same distribution, unless you give all-static-linked binary. (note that even a binary like netscape 4.x cannot run properly now with the new glibc because of java.) and you would likely ignore a bug-report for such, because the only answer is "it works for me" :) Takashi (in a pessmistic atmosphere) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf