From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: ice1724: from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5a upgrading problem Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:17:51 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <200407141718.03846@goldspace.net> <200407141749.42615@goldspace.net> <200407161858.08174@goldspace.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200407161858.08174@goldspace.net> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Andrew Gaydenko Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:58:08 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > Takashi, > > Inspired with successfull resolving of "build error in pcm_native.c" > problem I have become rather brave to ask some additional questions > concerning this message subject: > > - am I understand well, there were attempts to supply 96k earlier, > but old code has not supplied a working of 96k for wide range of > users, and code was redone to be more democratic but less functional > (at least for me)? for SPDIF? i don't know of it... > - what does it mean: "special handling" for 96k? Who is handler? > User? Further driver version? 96kHz is not defined in the standard format. it was an extention. > - are there some development patches to try 96k on current CVS base? no. to make the things clearer: the analog works fine with 96/192kHz. only the spdif matters. Takashi > Thanks in advance, > Andrew > > ======= On Wednesday 14 July 2004 17:57, Takashi Iwai wrote: ======= > At Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:49:42 +0400, > Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > > > Takashi, > > > > To tell the truth, have not understood the word "yet": just now (with 1.0.4) > > my receiver (as qjackctl) shows 96KHz (alsaplayer-jack-alsadriver-hw:0,1-spdif). > > Does it mean some redesign was done for this driver since 1.0.4? > > The spdif doesn't support 96kHz without a special handling. > It was a bug that 96kHz was accepted for that interface. > > > Takashi > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click