From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hda: Add STAC92HD83XXX_PWR_REF quirk
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:27:04 +0100
Message-ID: <s5hd4eftqs7.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <4977A42F.5030903@embeddedalley.com> <s5h7i4nx2mf.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<49787337.3030406@embeddedalley.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
	by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0729124402
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:27:05 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <49787337.3030406@embeddedalley.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Matthew Ranostay <mranostay@embeddedalley.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

At Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:23:03 -0500,
Matthew Ranostay wrote:
> 
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:39:43 -0500,
> > Matthew Ranostay wrote:
> >> @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ static hda_nid_t stac92hd83xxx_slave_dig_outs[2] = {
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  static unsigned int stac92hd83xxx_pwr_mapping[4] = {
> >> -	0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x80,
> >> +	0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x40,
> >>  };
> > 
> > What is this change?
> > 
> >
> From my patch before I made a mistake, somehow I thought port 0xe was 0xf in that
> change. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Well, if it's needed to be fixed, please create another patch, since
this change is basically independent from PWR_REF quirk.
Or, at least, include some proper description in changelog.


thanks,

Takashi