From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965730AbXDWKT5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:19:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965714AbXDWKT5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:19:57 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50445 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965730AbXDWKT4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:19:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:19:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Piotrowski , Chuck Ebbert , Adrian Bunk , perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions In-Reply-To: References: <20070416003714.GL3691@stusta.de> <4623EE59.7090005@redhat.com> <4627CB04.4060401@googlemail.com> <20070420111807.82d67afb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta27) (fiddleheads) (+CVS-20060704) (i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:26:10 +0200, I wrote: > > At Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:18:07 -0700, > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:34:18 +0200 > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > Good to hear! I forgot the patch description and sign-off, so here it > > > is again: > > > > > > > > > [PATCH] ALSA: intel8x0 - Fix Oops in crash kernel > > > > > > When intel8x0 driver is loaded in the crash kernel, it gets Oops > > > occasionally. This is because the irq handler gets called before > > > the proper hardware initialization. Now defer it after > > > snd_intel8x0_chip_init(). > > > > Neat, thanks. > > > > Do we think this is safe enough and important enough for 2.6.21? > > And if so, do you want me to merge it? > > It should be safe (as I already merged ALSA tree for 2.6.22), but I'd > like to test the following before merging 2.6.21: > - suspend/resume works > - no severe problem even if request_irq() fails > I'll check this in this weekend, so let's hold on. Both seem OK as far as I tested. So, feel free to push it to 2.6.21 if it's still allowed. Otherwise I'll queue it up to stable tree later. Thanks, Takashi