Re: [PATCH 0/4 v5] ALSA: dice: improve card registration processing

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:50:01 +0100,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Jan 06 2016 18:19, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:58:10 +0100,
> > Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patchset updates my previous one:
> >> [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/5 v4] ALSA: dice: improve card registration processing
> >> a
> >>
> >> Changes:
> >>  * Merge patch 02 and 03 in v4.
> >>  * Allocate sound card instance in sound card registration work, independently
> >>    of dice instance, allocated in .probe callback and set as driver_data of
> >>    device structure.
> >>  * Use __be32 type for __be32 data.
> >>
> >> In this version, sound card instance is not allocated in .probe callback. In
> >> the callback, dice instance is allocated independently of the card instance.
> >> Thus, in .probe callback, this driver reserve no slot of sound card. The
> >> allocation of sound card instance is performed in a scheduled work. When
> >> processing in the work fails, the work can be re-scheduled again according to
> >> bus reset.
> > 
> > Applied now all four patches.  Thanks.
> 
> OK. Thanks.
> 
> How about the rest of my work for ALSA Dice driver to Linux 4.5?
> 
> [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH 00/10 v2] ALSA: dice: stabiliza packet streaming
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2015-December/101897.html
> 
> It takes almost one month since I posted the RFCv2. We already had a
> discussion about the patchset in RFCv1 and in my opinion there's no
> thorough disagreement. If possible, I'd like to merge it in the merge
> window for Linux 4.5. If we go for it, I'll post them in this night.

Well, RFC is RFC and not for merging.  If it's meant for merging,
let's poke relevant people whether it's OK.


Takashi