From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: HDA: Add new revision for ALC662 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:24:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E9E9D53.1030502@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BB82452C for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:24:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4E9E9D53.1030502@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Henningsson Cc: ALSA Development Mailing List , kailang@realtek.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:50:11 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > > We found a new chip, with Vendor Id: 0x10ec0662 and Revision Id: > 0x100300. It seems to work well with patch_alc662, but I don't know if > patch_alc882 had been better, and actually, I don't know if there's much > of a difference between the two patch functions these days anyway. > > I'm cc:ing Kailang in case there's more to it (codec renaming, > processing coefficients etc) that we don't know of. OK, now I committed with the ack by Kailang. thanks, Takashi