From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: build error in pcm_native.c Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:08:14 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <200407161357.56902@goldspace.net> <200407161441.40443@goldspace.net> <200407161657.23244@goldspace.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200407161657.23244@goldspace.net> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Andrew Gaydenko Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:57:23 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > clean/(re)cvscompile were done. > > I'm not bash guru, but from common view some configure fragment seems > strange to me. I have got > > checking for new remap_page_range... "no" You have an old version of kernel, don't you? > Here 1 is assigned to new_remap (line 2). But CONFIG_OLD_REMAP_PAGE_RANGE > is defined (line 8) only when new_remap equals 0 (line 6). Must new_remap > assignement be reverted? It defines CONFIG_ *OLD* _REMAP_PAGE_RANGE. So it's correct. I don't understand why config.h wasn't generated properly... Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click