From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ALSA: hda/intel: stop probe if DMICS are detected on Skylake+ platforms Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:13:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190719170610.17610-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20190719170610.17610-7-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714F7F800C4 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:13:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20190719170610.17610-7-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: Hui Wang , Curtis Malainey , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org, Daniel Drake List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:06:10 +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > +static int azx_check_dmic(struct pci_dev *pci, struct azx *chip) > +{ > + struct nhlt_acpi_table *nhlt; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (chip->driver_type == AZX_DRIVER_SKL && > + pci->class != 0x040300) { > + nhlt = intel_nhlt_init(&pci->dev); > + if (nhlt) { > + if (intel_nhlt_get_dmic_geo(&pci->dev, nhlt)) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + dev_dbg(&pci->dev, "Digital mics found on Skylake+ platform, aborting probe\n"); IMO, this can be verbose, dev_info() would be suitable. Otherwise user has no idea why the module load is skipped. > @@ -2055,6 +2078,17 @@ static int azx_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, > card->private_data = chip; > hda = container_of(chip, struct hda_intel, chip); > > + /* > + * stop probe if digital microphones detected on Skylake+ platform > + * with the DSP enabled. This is an opt-in behavior defined at build > + * time or at run-time with a module parameter > + */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL_DETECT_DMIC) || dmic_detect >= 0) { Isn't it "dmic_detect != 0" ? Otherwise passing dmic_detect=0 would be treated as positive here. thanks, Takashi