From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: emu10k1 device naming Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:56:18 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <1090729766.1952.7.camel@mindpipe> <1090779307.14951.24.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Lee Revell , alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:55:05 +0200 (CEST), Jaroslav wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Lee Revell wrote: > > > Good point, this would be much easier to correct in JACK, than fix every > > driver to conform. There actually is no 1:1 correspondence between any > > of the capture and playback devices, so it's arbitrary to require the > > playback and a capture device to have the same hw index. > > I don't agree so much, because the most of users of the emu10k1 driver > want to use card only for VoIP, games and some amateur recording. For this > case, the first playback and capture devices are quite sufficient. Our > goal is to provide the basics functionality for first subdevices. Hmm, but there is no big disadvantage to use EFX for the default capture... Or do we have any? Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click