From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: timestamps on recorded events
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:01:08 +0200
Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <s5hr8llji4r.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204091221050.7128-100000@wotan.suse.de>
	<200204110944.AFK42109@msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk>
	<s5h8z7ule68.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
	<1018608745.13866.2.camel@insanity>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1018608745.13866.2.camel@insanity>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=alsa-devel>
To: Bob Ham <node@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

At 12 Apr 2002 11:52:25 +0100,
Bob Ham wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 11:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > 	// enable time-stamp-update mode
> > 	snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_update(subs, 1);
> > 	// if you want to get real-time (not tick), call the
> > 	// following, too
> > 	// snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_real(subs, 1);
> 
> Does the value of the integer that's passed to either of these functions
> make any difference, or is it just their non-zeroness?

the latter - it's non-zero boolean.


Takashi