Re: Splitting up the HDA-INTEL modules

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

At Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:46:25 -0200,
Claudio Matsuoka wrote:
> 
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:32 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > The current implementation is in such a form intentionally to make a
> > transition smoothly.  In this way, you can port the existing kernel
> > code quite easily to the new framework without losing functionality.
> > The worst thing is that the machine doesn't work any longer by this
> > transition.  That's why I don't want to move to a generic parser or a
> > dynamic parsing at the very first step.
> 
> Right, it's a good strategy.. I've built 0.0.10b against hg with only
> minor changes (notably 3 instances of
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration had to be removed from
> configure.in). However, hda-config still complains about ioctl
> PVERSION error (ioctl() with HDA_IOCTL_PVERSION returns -1). Known
> problem or should I investigate further?

Well, sorry, I've not tested the latest version with the latest driver
at all.  I just made it up to be applicable without rejects.

I'll track the problem tomorrow (or today if I have time)...


Takashi