From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: Re: The obsolence of OSS, Was: big smiley Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:12:12 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20040225133759.GH8820@sunrise.pg.gda.pl> <200402251417.i1PEHsZQ025905@dhin.linuxaudiosystems.com> <20040225145020.GI8820@sunrise.pg.gda.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040225145020.GI8820@sunrise.pg.gda.pl> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Adam Tla/lka Cc: Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:50:20 +0100, Adam Tla/lka wrote: > > > OSS cannot affect this in any way - its a function of the kernel > > scheduler and not the audio device API. > OK but we could have some kernel RT thread which is doing mixing > or MIDI emulation. if you start a thread, why it's needed to be a kernel thread at all? besides, you cannot use MMX/SSE/etc in kernel threads, which you wanted. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click