From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: Blackfin: update SPORT0 port selector (v2) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:47:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1225098565-6848-1-git-send-email-cooloney@kernel.org> <20081027113536.GC5896@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E6724712 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:47:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20081027113536.GC5896@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Cliff Cai , Bryan Wu , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:35:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:09:25PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote: > > From: Cliff Cai > > > > - Setting the TFS pin selector for SPORT 0 based on whether the selected > > port id F or G. If the port is F then no conflict should exist for the > > TFS. When Port G is selected and EMAC then there is a conflict between > > the PHY interrupt line and TFS. Current settings prevent the conflict > > by ignoring the TFS pin when Port G is selected. This allows both > > ssm2602 using Port G and EMAC concurrently. > > > > - some code cleanup > > > > Signed-off-by: Cliff Cai > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu > > Acked-by: Mark Brown Is this to be pushed for 2.6.28, or 2.6.29? thanks, Takashi