Re: Re: bug tracking?

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

At Thu, 15 May 2003 19:12:26 +0900,
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> > - no template for necessary information
> > 
> >   e.g. alsa version, driver, chip/board name/model, output of lspci
> >        output of proc files, etc.
> > 
> 
> These could easily be found with a simple script or maybe there couold 
> be an alsa.debug file in /proc/asound.

yes, a script would be nice.

> > 
> > also, a moderator person would be helpful in addition to the automatic
> > assignment according to the given driver/function.
> > 
> 
> How about having a bugs mailing list and also the address of the driver 
> writer. We could then post the report to the mailing list, the driver 
> writer and also archive it on the alsa website.

the system like bugzilla can communicate via e-mails, too.

> I will start making a bugs page over the next few days which we can fine 
> tune here. I'm not sure that bugzilla is appropriate for ALSA as we have 
> so many different devices to look after however I will use it as a 
> reference.

i'm familiar with bugzilla (not as an adamin but as a user :) and am
satisfied almost with it.  it's enough powerful.
but bugzilla has many configurations and we'll need to find out the
fitting one for our purpose.


Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com