From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: Alsa 0.9 and 2.4 kernel Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:41:39 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20020916142553.Y19700@thot.informatik.uni-kl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20020916142553.Y19700@thot.informatik.uni-kl.de> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Joerg Mayer Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org At Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:25:53 +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > Are there any plans to send alsa 0.9 (or 1.0 or whatever) to Marcelo for > inclusion into the official 2.4 tree? i don't believe that alsa will be intergated into 2.4 line. this will bring too much diffs - the whole bunch of oss tree is moved, if we keep the consistent structure with 2.5. > Another question in the same line: > Would renaming the modules for 2.4 to the same names as for 2.5 make sense? > I think so because the 2.5 naming is the way of the future and having > different naming schemes should be fixed as early as possible. all the current alsa-kernel codes are based on 2.5, and we provide additional wrappers for 2.4. is there any problem in this regard? btw, there is an unofficial patch set for 2.4 to include the alsa. ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/alsa/2.4-patches ciao, Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf