From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:30:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162257@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006161309.3078488-5-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf test attr: test-record-group-sampling fails on bare cycles
- [Medium] perf: test attr fails on hybrid due to PMU type shift in legacy-hardware-config
--
commit 89d023b229e1044502e25f88b4301ecff3715694
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests
Since b1c5efbfd92eb84d ("perf parse-events: Remove hard coded legacy
hardware and cache parsing"), event names are resolved with sysfs/JSON
priority over the legacy encodings, so bare cache-misses and
instructions now become the core PMU sysfs/JSON events. This patch
requests the legacy encodings explicitly with the legacy-hardware-config
term.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling1 b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling1
> index 4748ab7bf6843..5be9a1a2a4ff0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling1
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling1
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> [config]
> command = record
> -args = --no-bpf-event -e '{cycles,cache-misses}:S' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
> +args = --no-bpf-event -e '{cycles,default_core/legacy-hardware-config=3/}:S' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
[Severity: Medium]
Since "cycles" is left as a bare event, wouldn't this still fail the strict
type=0 and config=0 requirements later in this file?
If "cycles" resolves dynamically via sysfs/JSON to a core PMU event (typically
type=4), attr.py will read a non-zero type and fail the equality check. Should
"cycles" also be updated to "default_core/legacy-hardware-config=0/" to match
these expectations?
> ret = 1
> kernel_since = 6.12
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling2 b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling2
> index e0432244a0eb7..c05225167ec34 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling2
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group-sampling2
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> [config]
> command = record
> -args = --no-bpf-event -c 10000 -e '{cycles,cache-misses}:S' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
> +args = --no-bpf-event -c 10000 -e '{cycles,default_core/legacy-hardware-config=3/}:S' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, will leaving "cycles" as a bare event here cause a failure against
the strict expectations?
> ret = 1
> kernel_since = 6.12
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group1 b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group1
> index eeb1db392bc9c..0437ea4939e88 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group1
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/attr/test-record-group1
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> [config]
> command = record
> -args = --no-bpf-event -e '{cycles,instructions}' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
> +args = --no-bpf-event -e '{cycles,default_core/legacy-hardware-config=1/}' kill >/dev/null 2>&1
[Severity: Medium]
Will this fail on hybrid architectures like Intel Alder Lake?
On hybrid platforms, perf_pmus__supports_extended_type() evaluates to true.
This causes config_term_pmu() in tools/perf/util/parse-events.c to shift the
dynamic PMU type into the upper 32 bits of attr->config when using
legacy-hardware-config:
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:config_term_pmu() {
...
attr->config = term->val.num;
if (perf_pmus__supports_extended_type())
attr->config |= (__u64)attr->type << PERF_PMU_TYPE_SHIFT;
attr->type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
...
}
This could yield a config value of (4 << 32) | 1 instead of 1.
Since the test script keeps the hardcoded expected attribute config=1 and
tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/attr.py uses strict string equality, will this
result in an unavoidable test failure?
> ret = 1
>
> [event-1:base-record]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006161309.3078488-1-acme@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 16:13 [PATCH 0/6 v1] perf test attr: Fix the re-enabled test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf test attr: Propagate the return value from the test to the wrapper Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf test attr: Fix wrong size expectation for events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf test attr: Fix record dwarf sample_type expectation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf test attr: Fix default stat metrics expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf test attr: Relax group checking for ungrouped expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-06 16:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 0:00 ` [PATCH 0/6 v1] perf test attr: Fix the re-enabled test Namhyung Kim
2026-10-07 0:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-10-07 5:58 ` Arnaldo Melo
2026-10-07 8:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-12 22:40 ` Ian Rogers
2026-10-12 22:50 ` Arnaldo Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162257@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.