From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Daejun Park" <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: don't cache unzeroed blocks as written after a failed zeroout
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:50:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162554@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007-ext4-fc-zeroout-v1-1-b86de6439431@samsung.com>
> From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
>
> ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() may zero out the blocks before and
> after the range being written and convert them to written together with
> it, instead of splitting them off the unwritten extent. If
> ext4_ext_zeroout() fails for one side, it falls back to splitting the
> extent, so the blocks on that side stay unwritten in the extent tree.
> But zero_ex1 or zero_ex2 keeps its length, and ext4_zeroout_es() still
> inserts those blocks into the extent status tree as written.
>
> Until that entry goes away, a read of those blocks returns whatever was
> on the disk before the extent was allocated. A write to them is mapped
> from the cache and goes in place without converting the extent, so its
> data would read back as zeroes once the entry is dropped. To reproduce
> on 4 KiB blocks with -o nodelalloc: fallocate 32 KiB, map the last seven
> blocks of that extent to dm-error, write the first block, restore the
> mapping and read the second block. It returns the old disk contents
> instead of zeroes.
>
> Clear the length of an extent that could not be zeroed out, so that
> ext4_zeroout_es() skips it, as the comment at the out label intends.
>
> Fixes: 308c57ccf431 ("ext4: if zeroout fails fall back to splitting the extent node")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007-ext4-fc-zeroout-v1-0-b86de6439431@samsung.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 0:41 [PATCH 0/2] ext4: fix fast commit and extent status after unwritten extent zero-out Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 0:41 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-07 0:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: don't cache unzeroed blocks as written after a failed zeroout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 0:41 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-07 0:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 12:51 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-08 6:19 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-10-08 7:47 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-08 9:29 ` (2) " Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-10-07 0:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track zeroed out blocks of unwritten extents for fast commit Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 0:41 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-07 0:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 1:09 ` Daejun Park
2026-10-07 13:41 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-08 1:24 ` Daejun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162554@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.