All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 11:03:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-8-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pm: devres double-put of runtime PM reference on driver unbind
- [Medium] gpio: mxc: double clock disable on driver unbind due to devm_clk_get_optional_enabled and runtime PM
--

commit 22e651b0a155c89a26d690a7e46fed22ae9cc238
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

gpio: mxc: use local dev variable

Introduce a local 'struct device *dev' variable to replace repeated
'&pdev->dev' dereferences throughout mxc_gpio_probe(), improving
readability.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index f5f9ef1564cdf..9d69524e06dbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -481,17 +482,17 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return port->irq;
>  
>  	/* the controller clock is optional */
> -	port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, NULL);

[Severity: Medium]
Does this code lead to a double clock disable during driver unbind?

By using devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() here, a devres action is queued to
disable the clock when the device is unbound. However, when the device is
removed, the driver core calls pm_runtime_put_sync() to synchronously suspend
it, which triggers mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() and disables the clock:

drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:mxc_gpio_runtime_suspend() {
    ...
    clk_disable_unprepare(port->clk);
    ...
}

Afterwards, the devres cleanup sequence runs (leaving the device suspended)
and unconditionally executes the devm clock release action. Won't this call
clk_disable_unprepare() again on an already-disabled clock and trigger a
warning in the clock core?

>  	if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
>  		return PTR_ERR(port->clk);
>  
> -	err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> +	err = devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a devres double-put of the runtime PM reference on driver
unbind?

Using devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume() acquires a runtime PM usage count and
queues a devres action (pm_runtime_put_noidle_action) to release it upon
unbind.

>  	if (err)
> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to get PM runtime\n");
[ ... ]
> @@ -531,41 +532,41 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[ ... ]
>  	list_add_tail(&port->node, &mxc_gpio_ports);
>  
>  	mxc_update_irq_chained_handler(port, true);
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
> -	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);

[Severity: High]
Since gpio-mxc has no .remove callback to re-acquire the reference, won't
unbinding the driver (e.g. via unregistering the platform device) execute the
devres action queued by devm_pm_runtime_get_noresume(), causing a double-put?

Although pm_runtime_put_noidle() uses atomic_add_unless() to prevent the usage
counter from dropping mathematically below 0, this double-put could steal a
reference if another component is holding one. Can this accounting error cause
the device to prematurely runtime-suspend while still in use, leading to
unclocked hardware register access faults?

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v4-0-c9f5a8b50df9@nxp.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07 10:44 [PATCH v4 00/10] gpio: mxc: bug fixes and probe cleanup Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] gpio: mxc: fix race between chained IRQ handler install and probe completion Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  9:44     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09  0:57       ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] gpio: mxc: fix wakeup_pads bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 19:59   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  0:59     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] gpio: mxc: use for_each_set_bit() to iterate wakeup pads Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:00   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] gpio: mxc: replace of_device_is_compatible() with hwdata flags Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:05   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] gpio: mxc: convert pad wakeup compatible checks to " Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:10   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  1:00     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] gpio: mxc: convert probe error handling to devres Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08  9:47     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-10-09  2:25       ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:12   ` Frank Li
2026-10-09  2:18     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] gpio: mxc: switch probe error paths to dev_err_probe() Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 20:15   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 11:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 20:16   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] gpio: mxc: introduce MXC_ICR macros and use field_prep/field_get Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-08 20:25   ` Frank Li
2026-10-07 10:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] gpio: mxc: use BIT() macro for single-bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-07 10:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09  2:32     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-08 20:26   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162905@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.