From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Igor Velkov" <iav@iav.lv>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: meson-gx: report the longest busy wait the controller can do
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:40:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-164314@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008-meson-gx-busy-timeout-v2-3-8bde1adfb5b4@iav.lv>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mmc: meson-gx: max_busy_timeout patch unmasks pre-existing logic bug causing skipped busy waits
--
commit 8392473ffe7fe05ea31a587e9d682a2201cb340c
Author: Igor Velkov <iav@iav.lv>
mmc: meson-gx: report the longest busy wait the controller can do
The driver does not currently set max_busy_timeout, leading the core to
assume it can wait indefinitely and send commands with timeouts that exceed
the controller's maximum capability. This patch explicitly sets
max_busy_timeout to force the core to size discards appropriately and fall
back to software polling for long waits.
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> index dd7d3d67f0290..8de3eb65ccb07 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c
> @@ -1183,6 +1183,9 @@ static int meson_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CMD23;
>
> + /* The longest busy wait the CMD_CFG timeout field can hold. */
> + mmc->max_busy_timeout = SD_EMMC_CMD_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does setting the
max_busy_timeout here unmask a bug in the software polling fallback?
When a long-running command exceeds this timeout, the MMC core drops the
hardware R1B busy wait and relies on software polling using
meson_mmc_card_busy().
However, meson_mmc_card_busy() requires all 4 DAT lines to be low:
drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c:meson_mmc_card_busy() {
...
regval = readl(host->regs + SD_EMMC_STATUS);
/* We are only interrested in lines 0 to 3, so mask the other ones */
return !(FIELD_GET(STATUS_DATI, regval) & 0xf);
}
Since the MMC/SD spec dictates that only DAT0 is pulled low during busy while
DAT1-3 remain high, wouldn't this check immediately return false?
If so, the core would instantly send the next command while the card is still
busy erasing or flushing.
Could meson_mmc_card_busy() be updated to only check DAT0?
> if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ)
> mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008-meson-gx-busy-timeout-v2-0-8bde1adfb5b4@iav.lv?part=3
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 14:27 [PATCH v2 0/3] mmc: meson-gx: honour the busy timeout for R1b commands Igor Velkov
2026-10-08 14:27 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:27 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mmc: meson-gx: name the limit of the CMD_CFG timeout field Igor Velkov
2026-10-08 14:27 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:27 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: meson-gx: honour the busy timeout for R1b commands Igor Velkov
2026-10-08 14:28 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:28 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: meson-gx: report the longest busy wait the controller can do Igor Velkov
2026-10-08 14:28 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:28 ` Igor Velkov via B4 Relay
2026-10-08 14:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-164314@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=iav@iav.lv \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.