From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:39:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166650@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010142247.99223-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> Split virtio_transport_recv_pkt() so socket lookup is separate from the
> receive state machine that runs under the socket lock.
>
> Keep virtio_transport_recv_pkt() on its existing per-packet locking path.
> Pass the source and destination addresses used for lookup to the locked
> receive path so they are decoded only once.
>
> Pass the network namespace and decoded address tuple through a packet
> context to the locked receive path.
>
> Preserve source validation and failure handling. Keep the lookup reference
> separate from the skb owner reference so the locked receive path can manage
> the two lifetimes independently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010142247.99223-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 14:22 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 21:34 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:24 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-12 22:02 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:26 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-13 17:16 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 22:15 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-13 17:31 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] vsock/virtio: reuse same-flow socket lookup in RX batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:17 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:30 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 5:51 ` Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166650@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.