From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf symbol: Set dso symtab type for libbfd
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 18:34:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166825@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010182439.9732-3-namhyung@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] perf: double-free and state confusion in libbfd fallback path
--
commit 8791c82124897f35132a0fe029d993b2dcd4a6bc
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
perf symbol: Set dso symtab type for libbfd
It missed to set the dso symtab type when the symbols are loaded by
libbfd. When it happens both syms_ss and runtime_ss may not be set
and won't call dso__load_sym().
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index 5e63c3477570c..debd0a66f9669 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> @@ -1929,6 +1929,7 @@ int dso__load(struct dso *dso, struct map *map)
> symsrc__destroy(syms_ss);
> syms_ss = NULL;
> }
> + dso__set_symtab_type(dso, symtab_type);
> ret = 1;
> break;
> }
[Severity: High]
When dso__load_bfd_symbols() succeeds and sets ret = 1, this explicit
destruction of syms_ss does not remove the struct from the ss_ array because
ss_pos remains unmodified.
Does this lead to a double-free later in the cleanup loop?
tools/perf/util/symbol.c:dso__load() {
...
for (; ss_pos > 0; ss_pos--)
symsrc__destroy(&ss_[ss_pos - 1]);
...
}
Additionally, since runtime_ss is not cleared here, can execution incorrectly
fall through to dso__load_sym() and overwrite the successful ret = 1 value
from libbfd?
tools/perf/util/symbol.c:dso__load() {
...
if (runtime_ss && !syms_ss) {
syms_ss = runtime_ss;
}
/* We'll have to hope for the best */
if (!runtime_ss && syms_ss)
runtime_ss = syms_ss;
if (syms_ss)
ret = dso__load_sym(dso, map, syms_ss, runtime_ss, kmod);
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010182439.9732-1-namhyung@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 18:24 [PATCH v2 1/3] perf symbol: Fix symbol loading from libbfd Namhyung Kim
2026-10-10 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] perf symbol: Add missing symsrc__destroy() for libbfd Namhyung Kim
2026-10-10 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 19:01 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-10-10 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] perf symbol: Set dso symtab type " Namhyung Kim
2026-10-10 18:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-10 19:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-10-10 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] perf symbol: Fix symbol loading from libbfd sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 19:00 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166825@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.