From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Baokun Li" <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:20:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167342@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011170958.1759230-9-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> Splitting a bio advances the remaining bio's data unit number by the
> number of whole data units that were split off:
>
> bio_split()
> └─ bio_advance()
> └─ bio_crypt_advance()
> └─ bio_crypt_dun_increment(dun, bytes >> data_unit_size_bits)
>
> The shift truncates, so splitting inside a data unit leaves the
> remainder with the wrong data unit number and silently corrupts data.
>
> The split size is already rounded down to the logical block size, so
> this is only possible when the data unit size is larger than it, e.g.
> a fscrypt filesystem with a 4K block size on a device with a 512-byte
> logical block size.
>
> Fix this by rounding the split size down to a data unit boundary. The
> split alignment becomes the maximum of the logical block size, the
> data unit size, and the zone write granularity, so a zoned write still
> meets all three requirements.
>
> Split bios can be up to one data unit smaller than the queue limits
> allow, so a bio can be split a little more often. The number of
> segments for the split bio is still counted up to the size before the
> rounding, so it can be larger than needed; it is only used for
> accounting.
>
> Fixes: a892c8d52c02 ("block: Inline encryption support for blk-mq")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011170958.1759230-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:50 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 8:09 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167342@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.