From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Myeonghun Pak" <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: renesas-rtca3: Join interrupt handlers before unregistering the RTC
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:04:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167505@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011225657.rtca3-irq-ordering.2@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] rtc: renesas-rtca3: mixing goto and scoped_guard in rtca3_set_alarm()
--
commit 847b7d6e6378d6cee33935541f2c60ff982bf01d
Author: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
rtc: renesas-rtca3: Join interrupt handlers before unregistering the RTC
This commit addresses an issue where interrupt handlers might still run
after the RTC operations have been cleared. It tracks a stopping state
to reject setup requests and disables IRQs synchronously during removal.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-renesas-rtca3.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-renesas-rtca3.c
> index c304ed60edc6c..9b177a131c272 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-renesas-rtca3.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-renesas-rtca3.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -392,6 +399,9 @@ static int rtca3_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *wkalrm)
> int ret;
>
> scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &priv->lock) {
> + if (priv->stopping)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
[Severity: Low]
Does this mix goto-based error handling and scope-based cleanup helpers in
the same function?
According to include/linux/cleanup.h and subsystem guidelines, usage of
"goto" and cleanup helpers should never be mixed in the same function. All
resources that need a "goto" cleanup should either be converted to
scope-based cleanup or remain manually managed.
In this case, rtca3_set_alarm() uses
scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &priv->lock) here, but later relies on:
if (ret)
goto setup_failed;
which violates the cleanup helper guidelines and creates confusing ownership
and control flow semantics during alarm setup failures.
> tmp = readb(priv->base + RTCA3_RCR2);
> if (!(tmp & RTCA3_RCR2_START))
> return -EPERM;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011225657.rtca3-irq-ordering.0@gmail.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 22:57 [PATCH 0/2] rtc: renesas-rtca3: Fix IRQ initialization and teardown ordering Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-11 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: renesas-rtca3: Initialize the RTC before requesting interrupts Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-11 23:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: renesas-rtca3: Join interrupt handlers before unregistering the RTC Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-11 23:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167505@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.