All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ketil Johnsen" <ketil.johnsen@arm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] drm/panthor: Create kernel BO from existing GEM
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:12:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168147@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012125940.3291951-10-ketil.johnsen@arm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm/panthor: integer truncation of size_t to u32 in panthor_kernel_bo_create_from_gem()
- [Low] drm/panthor: unused usage_flags parameter in panthor_gem_create()
--

commit e696a47bb56852d031f4d4fbdb9474523f19a3f1
Author: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>

drm/panthor: Create kernel BO from existing GEM

Refactors/splits existing panthor_kernel_bo_create(). Adds
panthor_kernel_bo_create_from_gem() so we can create kernel BOs
from imported protected memory in future change.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> index 0af4ae47780be..ec6eba8e2ac3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1036,7 +1036,6 @@ panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags,
>  		bo->base.resv = bo->exclusive_vm_root_gem->resv;
>  	}
>  
> -	panthor_gem_debugfs_add_usage_flags(bo, usage_flags);
>  	panthor_gem_debugfs_bo_add(bo);
>  	return bo;

[Severity: Low]
Since the call to panthor_gem_debugfs_add_usage_flags() is removed here, does
this leave the usage_flags parameter entirely unused in panthor_gem_create()? 

Should the parameter be removed from the function signature as well to avoid
dead code?

[ ... ]
> @@ -1274,46 +1275,33 @@ void panthor_kernel_bo_destroy(struct panthor_kernel_bo *bo)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * panthor_kernel_bo_create() - Create and map a GEM object to a VM
> + * panthor_kernel_bo_create_from_gem() - Create kernel BO from existing GEM object
[ ... ]
>  struct panthor_kernel_bo *
> -panthor_kernel_bo_create(struct panthor_device *ptdev, struct panthor_vm *vm,
> -			 size_t size, u32 bo_flags, u32 vm_map_flags,
> -			 u64 gpu_va, const char *name)
> +panthor_kernel_bo_create_from_gem(struct panthor_device *ptdev,
> +				  struct panthor_vm *vm,
> +				  struct panthor_gem_object *bo,
> +				  u32 vm_map_flags, u64 gpu_va, u32 vm_map_size)

[Severity: Medium]
Does this cause an implicit integer truncation on 64-bit platforms?

The panthor_kernel_bo_create() function takes size as a size_t (which is 64
bits wide), but passes it to vm_map_size here, which is declared as a u32:

panthor_kernel_bo_create(..., size_t size, ...)
{
        ...
        kbo = panthor_kernel_bo_create_from_gem(ptdev, vm, bo, vm_map_flags,
                                                gpu_va, size);
        ...
}

Could this lead to silent partial allocations or out-of-bounds accesses if a
kernel BO size ever exceeds 4GB?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012125940.3291951-1-ketil.johnsen@arm.com?part=9

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 12:59 [PATCH v4 00/12] drm/panthor: Protected mode support for Mali CSF GPUs Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] drm/panthor: De-duplicate FW memory section sync Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] drm/panthor: Minor scheduler refactoring Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 13:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] drm/panthor: Pass drm_file instead of panthor_file Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] drm/panthor: Don't allocate protm_suspend_buf Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] drm/panthor: Add support for entering and exiting protected mode Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 13:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] drm/panthor: New function for FW section map flags Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] drm/panthor: Keep size and VA in FW section obj Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] drm/panthor: Refactor GEM usage flags assignment Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] drm/panthor: Create kernel BO from existing GEM Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 13:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] drm/panthor: Support FW init of protm Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] drm/panthor: Protm support for groups Ketil Johnsen
2026-10-12 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] drm/panthor: Bump version to expose protm feature Ketil Johnsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168147@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.