From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9116B34F24E; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791816178; cv=none; b=c4MskNz7Y5LtAcLAv4maWkjU9N6sheMBplfsBKEGRQllTFWlq08Jw1NO+j49vvxYkRuUCStwG2fAptn/uGN+eUUsgEoubuT1T6ma+GAV0XKBAydiKjOvAryryxiz41jUfoUqyYDStDQQf6S/WWTiEuhUqpIfSwiob33Jqlq0Teo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791816178; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uIw2/nYIL5h9gV0BUNh6m/qmH++OLFfRQZypSauPEnk=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=TF+4QbonWvJ5Ly+vgptNzf7GnxMh+XYtYd+Mvz2Fz8P8lxuXJG+1ee1upA9qf2kCeh1+/sRG8vVYVPfoeAObN0AQ9+bFBEdXpW2sUgDUlVWl3+J4dDa9BHSk3B8c5bxwCnrcgXBWuVgqIhH9G8MAlauGLU3fg8yMfb9gapdFaVI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V8+NE61s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V8+NE61s" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 505091F0089C; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:42:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791816177; bh=tfQui7MmNdg7F1M89hDAOxepZhPPNEMrebr8WuEPalI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=V8+NE61spG14BMJEcp2Fzyiptd/gfKHey7E0JYG3VYqrgpHzLSIDuPhI9sIpkCwFk ssaETYa9Lyitjre1Gy5rBxmmRvuc7vs+URiL/gdupt1I09hfvdhKN/B00sGwxRGVGS gmwb7ufebTL+oP9Gp6/xUPdPNt/+4Odge/2OZ9MMb7fs8ITLWYkzDCagsUChKcjIi+ m4hlv91yJsm5AMPL2Ps/f2yGwmYrKRCrU67GIJ8+V+Cj3m93DT0KDCIGnW9zpg4TXt g/AhPhXrA+JOnCA4ACcolSLJQsplUNNTYqkPAIPfYGHQB+0pLS3NNxITEXP9Bk6SrG sl92gsNJCoWgw== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 09/10] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Herve Codina" Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261012142826.159178-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> References: <20261012142826.159178-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20261012142826.159178-10-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:42:56 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > During the instantiation of devices described by a device-tree overlay > applied on a PCI device, devlink displays the following kind of debug > messages instead of creating the expected links: > 'Not linking xxxx - might never become dev' >=20 > Without those expected links, the device removal order cannot be > correct. >=20 > Those debug traces are printed by fw_devlink_create_devlink(). In our > use case, they are all printed because the supplier of the link has at > least one of its ancestor with its fwnode flag FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED > set. >=20 > The culprit ancestor is the PCI root bridge. >=20 > [ ... ] > are correctly created. >=20 > Fixes: 1f340724419e ("PCI: of: Create device tree PCI host bridge node") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012142826.1591= 78-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com?part=3D9