From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/21] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach()
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:16:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168381@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012154024.29423-10-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] bpf: Use-After-Free of trampoline images when text poke batch fails in detach
--
commit 357aa776c5f19ab7b39da8fb3843fb0141fc3b7f
Author: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach()
This commit introduces multi-attach and detach helpers for BPF trampolines.
These helpers prepare target trampolines, apply text pokes in batch, and
commit the staged trampoline images.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
[ ... ]
> +static void bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
> +{
> + if (tr->multi_attach.new_image)
> + bpf_tramp_image_put(tr->multi_attach.new_image);
> +
> + tr->flags = tr->multi_attach.old_flags;
> + tr->multi_attach.old_image = NULL;
[Severity: Critical]
If __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog() fails and calls
bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(), old_image is cleared for the node.
Does this guarantee that a subsequent bpf_text_poke_batch() will fail
due to a NOP expectation mismatch?
> + tr->multi_attach.new_image = NULL;
> + tr->multi_attach.old_flags = 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +void bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_detach(struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link)
> +{
> + struct bpf_tracing_multi_node *mnode;
> + int i, err;
> +
> + trampoline_lock_all();
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link) {
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_init(mnode->trampoline);
> + err = __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&mnode->node, mnode->trampoline, NULL,
> + &trampoline_multi_prog_ops, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ONCE(err, "__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failed: %d\n", err))
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(mnode->trampoline);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link) {
> + link->pokes[i] = &mnode->poke;
> + bpf_text_poke_init(link->pokes[i], mnode->trampoline);
> + }
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_text_poke_batch(link->pokes, link->nodes_cnt));
[Severity: Critical]
If bpf_text_poke_batch() fails here (for example, due to a hardware or memory
error during patching, or a NOP mismatch from a prior unlink failure), the
failure is wrapped in WARN_ON_ONCE but otherwise ignored.
The code then proceeds to unconditionally call
bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_commit() for all nodes, which frees old_image
via bpf_tramp_image_put().
Since the kernel text remains unmodified after a failed poke batch, it will
continue to jump to the freed old_image. Can this lead to a use-after-free
on traced paths?
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link)
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_commit(mnode->trampoline);
> +
> + trampoline_unlock_all();
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link)
> + bpf_trampoline_put(mnode->trampoline);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012154024.29423-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 15:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/21] bpf: Initialize ftrace_managed in bpf_trampoline_get() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/21] bpf: Drop unnecessary ftrace_location() in register/unregister/modify_fentry_multi() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_prepare_insns() helper on x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_check_ip() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/21] bpf, x86: Introduce bpf_arch_text_poke_batch() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/21] bpf: Add bpf_text_poke_batch() helper in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/21] bpf: Check tgt_prog before is_tracing_multi_id() in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/21] bpf: Move helpers out of CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/21] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/21] bpf: Shrink CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard scope for bpf_tracing_multi_attach() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/21] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link fdinfo " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link info " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach failure tests Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog cookie test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog rollback test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog link info test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/21] selftests/bpf: Test tailcall with fentry.multi Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/21] selftests/bpf: Benchmark tracing_multi bpf progs attachment Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168381@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.