From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C40547071 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791849963; cv=none; b=JWS8pXk/IL9Q7nL8e9GLB1DvlphIjP3RGKoobJAhBD8JJWjgyp8N4qHMvT9EysNBp33bKl88q6TxAPc4j4HL6SQlFaqXgav1VKltvYZcCdRLcG687RM/J75HVsCsgmJ8Fv3Ry2KSjPXXjs90PK4fh0MYxmGsT2PuENubmvhJLAU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791849963; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YTBzaQ7nQAWlpWRtIgMRnK7D8S0R3GeEKXibxeTyqfc=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=claxeIulBVWC96GpH+X/LoVI6mkdYhcXlyhBP+3yEmqB4NF5rjXwI9iT/qCx7xKj0e2u8TNuGIFognYVlpeNDWOsB9c6pFs+LPT664aGQWp8S/IpMT/3ufMZXj5U6WrMX7xjpifNrvzk+s8w0FodSY5KO+r+s9ww38Q5c6rof0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=k3wcVKQX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k3wcVKQX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446B11F008A1; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:06:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791849962; bh=YTBzaQ7nQAWlpWRtIgMRnK7D8S0R3GeEKXibxeTyqfc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=k3wcVKQXOf/0zYBETkpoeGg+OGqQjeAyL336EnRdEVuy7O+zdVpaWvjjC6aAnAMef EtpuxHWxF6mE0uy8iXBwfU/ZnEvGuVHz8eBk/gMoRIT0HazV6y91R1eDYDSpeyKAUU b4Hxc4r83TkGBiDAsQ7xks69ZD98tvHCaEV22UJU2z8YRA9WFjdBv5DyVHRthIPBV9 I0SfIG6t4nEn/1W815QAFXtQlMq8jtalMKbCymWW8RXEhJ6Hob9iQLHfwxOE9p9fAb GYvPw4EXOonBMqn6PgP10KmdJgOWo5FiTiAJJYY8WIZVuqNn73miSU7u5Rbs86pdoo ahGtk3YBbHT/g== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] vsock/test: cover SO_INQ Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Carlier" Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Eugenio Perez" , virtualization@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20261012235524.41468-3-devnexen@gmail.com> References: <20261012235524.41468-1-devnexen@gmail.com> <20261012235524.41468-3-devnexen@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:06:01 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Check the SCM_INQ value after a partial receive, after draining the > queue and at EOF, that no cmsg is sent while the option is off, and > that out of range values and SOCK_SEQPACKET are rejected. >=20 > Signed-off-by: David Carlier Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012235524.4146= 8-1-devnexen@gmail.com?part=3D2